Don't Rush to Simplicity

Today I want to talk about a meme. This meme takes many forms, but it’s latest iteration is the Midwit meme:

Alt Text

You could abstractly view this as a clever blend of the Haha Go Brrr meme with Horseshoe theory, but that’d be an incredibly “100 IQ” way to overanalyze a meme. At the end of the day, it is just an incredibly flexible meme that has somehow outgrown its edgy, racist roots to be applied everywhere from finance to linguistics to biology.

It can be distilled to the simple observation that total beginners and total experts can often share a love of simplicity, in a way that absolutely infuriates the book smart intermediates.

You feel it when a self described “15 IQ” electrician makes $3.4 million on knockoff dog themed cryptocurrency, in perfect sympatico with the 150 IQ Elon Musk.

I felt it when Jan Hatzius, the longtime Chief Economist at Goldman Sachs, talks up his ”above-consensus GDP growth projections” like it means a damn, whereas degenerate gamblers and PhD quants alike just remind each other to “buy low, sell high”.

I get the same feeling when senior software engineers stop at ”it depends” and pat themselves on the back for a job well done. A generation earlier you could find the same middle-of-the-curve engineers worshipping “Uncle Bob” (the jury is out on the “IQ” of the median remnant Clean Coder). Now the same midwit engineers (of which I am one) wage toxic tribal wars over frameworks, while Pieter Levels makes >$1m a year with a single PHP file and just learned git.

You could keep going:

  • Piet Mondrian’s journey from learning to draw in primary school to imitating the impressionist masters at age 27 to the famous Mondrian squares at age 58 he could have drawn as a primary schooler
  • The Silicon Valley nerds drinking Soylent and wearing $400 health rings, compared to total meatheads and ultrafit athletes who simply “Eat Less Move More”
  • The Fortune Cookie Twitter accounts that can tweet shit like ”Pain is a fact. Suffering is a choice.” and get 100x the engagement of tryhard social media managers who spend hours strategizing over the biweekly tweetstorm with coerced retweets from coworkers.

Alt Text

After you see enough of these, you have to wonder:

Can we just skip the complexity? From simple on this side of the curve, straight to simple on the other side? Bypass the complex phase like an Einstein-Rosen bridge? Aren’t they just the same thing?

My answer, after a lot of admittedly 100 IQ introspection, is: No.

You don’t get to 80/20 hack your way to enlightenment by imitating it.

You’ve probably heard this story before:

  • A businessman finds a fisherman, who is living an idyllic, peaceful life by the sea.
  • He laughs and tells the fisherman how to get rich instead.
  • The fisherman asks him what he will do after he gets rich.
  • He replies that he would retire to an idyllic, peaceful life by the sea.

There’s supposed to be a deep life lesson in there, but it’s always felt insincere to me.

To me it is better to have reached the heights of a career, or suffered an epic defeat, even if I do end up in the same place as everyone else in the end.

To me simplicity is made more beautiful when understood through a long personal struggle with complexity. When I can dance with it, having turned a mighty nemesis into an old friend, and teach others to do the same.

Better to have loved and lost, than never to have loved at all.

After all, we share the same destination. The ultimate horseshoe is biblical in nature: dust shall inevitably return to dust. What is life, then, but our unique, 100 IQ, wandering journey through vicissitudes?

“I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity.” - Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.

Thanks to David Golden for reviewing an early draft of this — his take:

  • “My (possibly mid-curve) view is that left-curve people love simplicity, but their success with simplicity is luck driven, which is infuriating, driving mid-curve people to try to systematize away from luck.
  • Whereas right curve have either learned to succeed with simplicity without luck, or have learned that luck is what matters so don’t overcomplicate. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
  • And thus your point about the journey is that you can’t get to systematic success with simplicity without the mid-curve experience.”

Tagged in: #reflections #complexity #memes

Leave a reaction if you liked this post! 🧡
Loading comments...
Webmentions
❤️ 0 💬 25
  • avatar of Christian Ganev
    Christian Ganev mentioned this on 2021-07-03
  • avatar of Rohit kr.
    Rohit kr. retweeted
  • avatar of Bọ́lájí Ayọ̀dejì
    Bọ́lájí Ayọ̀dejì retweeted
  • avatar of Oliver
    Oliver mentioned this on 2021-05-16

    Exactly this!! Can we skip the “over engineering” phase when learning how to be a great programmer?

  • avatar of Trevor Blades
    Trevor Blades retweeted
  • avatar of Mike Sherov (he/him) BLM
    Mike Sherov (he/him) BLM mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    I draw same conclusion as you though. Can't "skip" the middle. But not because it's some "love the journey" thing or "the accomplishment is the journey", but rather because you just can't tell people stuff. They have to feel it themselves. Apprenticeship matters.

  • avatar of Mike Sherov (he/him) BLM
    Mike Sherov (he/him) BLM mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    On the left is person who is solving what they know with huge set of unknowns, person in middle is solving what they known with small set of unknowns, neither is avoiding succumbing to the base instinct of adding stuff as the way to solve things.

  • avatar of Mike Sherov (he/him) BLM
    Mike Sherov (he/him) BLM mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    Hi! Love the post. I wonder though if it ignores that reality that "add complexity as a solution" is a cognitive bias in general, regardless of 100 IQ or midwit? That is, I agree the meme is BS, because I don't think the "midwit" is actually smarter than the guy on the left.

  • avatar of swyx
    swyx mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    oh yes i like this as a way to separate left and right. and no we dont have to distinguish them by “intelligence”, thats just the basic interpretation of the meme

  • avatar of Michael Bromley
    Michael Bromley mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    "intelligence doesn't matter for success" maybe we miss-define intelligence in that case. Perhaps that set of qualities which brings success should be by definition "intelligence" and the other thing is just "educated" or "knowing facts".

  • avatar of Peter Aufner
    Peter Aufner mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    "you can't get to systematic success with simplicity without the mid-curve experience." swyx.io/simplicity-rus…

  • avatar of Michael Bromley
    Michael Bromley mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    Great article BTW. It brings to mind the point of "judgement", the quality which defines the experienced practitioner and is built on hard-won experience. Prior to that you either have to inkling of it (left side) or cling to the outward signals of it without substance (middle)

  • avatar of Igor Gassmann
    Igor Gassmann mentioned this on 2021-05-15

    Loved this post by @swyx swyx.io/simplicity-rush it reminded me the short film Zima blue: netflix.com/title/80174608

Subscribe to the newsletter

Join >10,000 subscribers getting occasional updates on new posts and projects!

I also write an AI newsletter and a DevRel/DevTools newsletter.

Latest Posts

Search and see all content